Facebook Continues to Resist Calls to Limit Political Advertising, Fact-Check Content

The social network countered with giving users controls and access to more information

Facebook continued to say private companies should not make decisions on political ads. - Credit by Facebook, Getty Images
Headshot of David Cohen

Facebook’s latest response to the ongoing debate over how it should handle political advertising and false information in political ads and content is putting more controls in the hands of users.

Director of product management for ads Rob Leathern echoed the philosophy shared by CEO Mark Zuckerberg late last year, saying in a Newsroom post Thursday that Facebook does not believe decisions about political ads should be made by private companies and calling for legislation on the matter, both in the U.S. and internationally.

Leathern addressed Facebook’s policy of not fact-checking content from politicians, writing, “We have based (our policy) on the principle that people should be able to hear from those who wish to lead them, warts and all, and that what they say should be scrutinized and debated in public.”

Bill Russo, deputy communications director for former Vice President Joe Biden’s presidential campaign, was unimpressed, saying in a statement, “Donald Trump’s campaign can (and will) still lie in political ads. Facebook can (and will) still profit off it. Today’s announcement is more window dressing around their decision to allow paid misinformation.”

Fellow 2020 presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) weighed in via Twitter: “Facebook is paying for its own glowing fake news coverage, so it’s not surprising that they’re standing their ground on letting political figures lie to you. Facebook needs real competition and accountability so that our democracy isn’t held hostage to their desire to make money.”

Her tweet referenced a controversy earlier this week in which Teen Vogue published a story about Facebook’s election integrity efforts without a branded content label, eventually added one and then wound up deleting the story altogether.

The social network will begin rolling out a feature later in January that enables people to choose how advertisers can reach them with its custom audiences targeting tools, which use anonymized, hashed data such as users’ email addresses and phone numbers.

The new control will apply to ads on all topics, and it will give people the option of no longer seeing ads based on an advertiser’s custom audience from a list or, conversely, to see ads if advertisers used lists to exclude them.

Facebook will also add a control to its Ad Preferences menu, giving people the power to opt to see fewer political and issue ads on the social network and its Instagram photo- and video-sharing network.

Federal Election Commission commissioner Ellen Weintraub ripped into Facebook in a series of tweets, saying, “Facebook’s weak plan suggests that the company has no idea how seriously it is hurting democracy. No one is a bigger believer in transparency than I. But here, proposing ‘transparency’ solutions is window-dressing when Facebook needs to be putting out the house fire it has lit.”

Weintraub added, “I am not willing to bet the 2020 elections on the proposition that Facebook has solved its problems with a solution whose chief feature appears to be that it doesn’t seriously impact the company’s profit margins … I strongly urge Facebook to go back to the drawing boards and come back with something much more robust. This will not do.”

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey said late last October that his company would no longer accept political ads, and a more formal policy was introduced the following month, while Google revealed last November that political advertisers were limited to targeting audiences based on age, gender, general location and postal code.

Leathern addressed the moves by both of those companies, saying that Facebook opted for transparency and controls over outright bans or limited targeting, and adding, “Unlike Google, we have chosen not to limit targeting of these ads. We considered doing so, but through extensive outreach and consultations, we heard about the importance of these tools for reaching key audiences from a wide range of NGOs (nongovernmental organizations), nonprofits, political groups and campaigns, including both Republican and Democrat committees in the U.S.”

According to Facebook, over 85% of ad spending on its platform by U.S. presidential candidates is on campaigns targeted to audiences estimated at 250,000 people or more.

There appear to be differences of opinion among top Facebook brass on the impact of targeting, as vice president of consumer hardware Andrew Bosworth said in an internal Facebook post in late December, which was leaked and eventually shared publicly earlier this week, that Trump’s 2016 campaign was “the single best digital ad campaign I’ve ever seen from any advertiser, period,” and citing its use of custom audiences as a key factor for Trump’s eventual victory.

The Trump campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

The social network’s targeting tools have been used effectively on a smaller scale, as well. Ann-Marie Holman, public information officer for EmpowerLA, the primary support agency for the city of Los Angeles’ Neighborhood Council system, said in an interview last month that her organization used custom audiences to simulate the city’s Neighborhood Council boundaries and ensure that the right people were seeing the right ads.

Holman added in an interview Thursday that when it comes to local politics and ensuring that everyone has access to the same information and services, “In order to do it right and do it equitably, you have to vary the messages and be sensitive to cultural and geographic differences. If you do it well, it should be like a concierge service. It should be a convenience to people so that they don’t need to wade through irrelevant information.”

Facebook will also update its Ad Library transparency offerings, adding ranges for potential reach (meaning the estimated target audience size for every political or issues ad), as well as enabling people to search for ads with exact phrases, improving the grouping of similar ads and adding new filters that can be used to analyze data, including audience size, dates and regions reached.

Leathern said of Thursday’s updates, “We recognize that this is an issue that has provoked much public discussion—including much criticism of Facebook’s position. We are not deaf to that, and we will continue to work with regulators and policymakers in our ongoing efforts to help protect elections.”


david.cohen@adweek.com David Cohen is editor of Adweek's Social Pro Daily.
Publish date: January 9, 2020 https://stage.adweek.com/digital/facebook-continues-to-resist-calls-to-limit-political-advertising-fact-check-content/ © 2020 Adweek, LLC. - All Rights Reserved and NOT FOR REPRINT
{"taxonomy":"","sortby":"","label":"","shouldShow":""}